This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Delhi HC Quashed Reopening Notice as Issued Beyond Six-Year Limitation
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Mohd Athar Anjum Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Mohd Athar Anjum Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court)
Reopening u/s 148 beyond six years from end of AY 2016–17 held time-barred; notice and consequent assessment quashed in view of limitation under proviso to Section 149 as clarified in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal.
Core Issue: Whether a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for AY 2016–17 after expiry of six years from the end of the relevant assessment year is barred by limitation in view of the first proviso to Section 149(1), and whether such time-barred cases can be reopened under the new reassessment regime.
Read SC ...





