Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ritu Singhal Vs DCIT/ACIT (ITAT Dehradun)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ritu Singhal Vs DCIT/ACIT (ITAT Dehradun) ITAT Deletes Addition: Why Employee Bank Accounts Aren’t Unexplained Money; Cash Found During Search Explained by Cash Book: Addition Deleted; Tax Ruling: Cash Rich Business Justifies Cash-in-Hand Found During Search; Unexplained Cash Addition Quashed as Source is Supported by Books; Employee Salary Accounts Not Assessee’s Income: Section 69A Deletion Assessee, proprietor of a petrol pump, faced additions u/s 69A on two counts — (i) ₹1.74 lakh treated as unexplained money lying in employees’ bank accounts, & (ii) ₹4.87 lakh as...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930