Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : High Volt Electricals (P.) Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal No. 3813 (Mum.) of 2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 26/09/2018
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

High Volt Electricals (P.) Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Since both the employee’s and employer’s contribution to Provident Fund was covered under the amended provision of section 43B, therefore Employees contribution to Provident fund (EPF), beyond the due date stipulated under the Provident Fund Act but before the due date of filing return of income under section 139(1) could not be disallowed by invoking section 43B of Income Tax Act, 1961.

FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGMENT

The present appeal filed by the assessee for A.Y. 2013-14 is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Thane, dated 25.04.2017, which in turn arises from the order passed by the A.O under Sec. 143(3) of the Income-tax act, 1961 (for short ‘Act’), dated 29.02.2016. The assessee assailing the order of the CIT(A) has raised before us the following grounds of appeal:-

“1. Employees Contribution to Provident Fund of Rs. 6,30,867/-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031