Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22639 Results

Addition for notional interest in absence of actual receipt not justified

Case Name : Highways Construction Co Pvt Ltd Vs CIT (Guwahati High Court)
Appeal Number : Equivalent Citation - (1993) 199 ITR 702 (Gau)
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/11/1992
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14151) Guwahati High Court (123)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Modi Cement Limited v. Union of India (Delhi High Court) (1992) 193 ITR 91

Case Name : Modi Cements Ltd Vs Union Of India And Others (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : (1992) 193 ITR 91 (Del)
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/10/1991
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14151) Delhi High Court (3416)

CIT Vs. Pandavapura Sahakara Sakkare Kharkane Ltd. (1992) 198 ITR 690 

Case Name : Commissioner of Income-Tax Vs Pandavapura Sahakara Sakkare Kharkane Ltd. (Karnataka High Court)
Appeal Number : 1992 198 ITR 690 a KAR
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/09/1991
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14151) Karnataka High Court (655)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Depreciation can be allowed only if Assessee claimed & Furnished details in ROI

Case Name : Commissioner Of Income-Tax Vs Arun Textile (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : 1991 192 ITR 700 Guj
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/06/1991
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14151) Gujarat High Court (1144)

A.L.A. Firm v. CIT (Supreme Court) (1991) 189 ITR 285 (SC)

Case Name : A.L.A. Firm Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Madras (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : 189 ITR 285 (SC) , 1991 SCR (1) 624,1991 SCC (2) 558, Jt 1991 (2) 7, 1991 Scale (1)364
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/02/1991
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2389)

CIT vs. Indramani Devi Singhania (Allahabad High Court)

Case Name : CIT Vs Smt Indramani Devi Singhania(1991) -Allahabad High Court
Appeal Number : 189 ITR 124 (All)
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/01/1991
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14151) Allahabad High Court (809)

Can assessee claim exemption U/s. 54 for acquisition of more than one house?

Case Name : K.C. Kaushik Vs P.B. Rane (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : 1990 (3) Bom CR 160, 1990 185 ITR 499 Bom
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/04/1990
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14151) Bombay High Court (1904)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sothia Mining and Manufacturing Corporation Ltd., (186 ITR 182)

Case Name : Commissioner Of Income-Tax Vs Sothia Mining and Manufacturing Corporation Ltd. (Calcutta High Court)
Appeal Number : 1990 186 ITR 182 Cal
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/03/1989
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14151) Calcutta High Court (858)

Collector, Land Acquisition Vs. MST.Katiji & Ors., (167 ITR 471) (SC)

Case Name : Collector Land Acquisition Vs. Mst. Katiji & Ors.(Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : 1987 AIR 1353, 1987 SCR (2) 387, 1987 SCC (2) 107, JT 1987 (1) 537, 1987 SCALE (1)413
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/02/1987
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2389)

Orkay Silk Mills Limited & others vs. M.S.Bindra & Others (Bombay High Court)

Case Name : Orkay Silk Mills Limited & others vs M.S. Bindra And Others (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : 1986 (9) ECC 44, 1988 (19) ECR 503 Bombay, 1988 (33) ELT 48 Bom
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/02/1986
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14151) Bombay High Court (1904)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031