Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22497 Results

Deduction u/s. 80-IA(8) has nothing to do with fixing of tariff rate for supply of power to consumer

Case Name : The Commissioner of Income Tax- ­10 Vs M/s. Reliance Energy Ltd. (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal No. 6792 Of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 26/11/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13954) Bombay High Court (1882)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Retrospective amendment in clarificatory nature to existing tax incentive provision is not unconstitutional

Case Name : Katira Construction Ltd. Vs Union of India & 2 (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : SPECIAL Civil Application no. 10828 to 10835, 10863, 10864, 11269, 11286 to 11288, 11312, 11781, 12184, 12233 to 12235, 13073 to 13076 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/03/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13954) Gujarat High Court (1140)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Reassessment not valid if reasons recorded by AO were not sufficient ‘reasons to believe’

Case Name : The Commissioner of Income Tax- 3 Vs ICICI Bank Ltd. (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal No. 1237 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/07/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13954) Bombay High Court (1882)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

S. 154 Order can be rectified by AO without giving opportunity of hearing to Assessee

Case Name : Chandigarh Vs. Punjab Agro Industries Corporation Ltd. (Punjab and Hariyana High Court)
Appeal Number : ITC No. 77 of 1999
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/03/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13954) Punjab and Haryana HC (457)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

HC recommends US-like ‘restatement of law’ to consign a large body of useless case law to dustbin of legal history

Case Name : Commissioner of Income-tax, Raipur Vs Union of India (High Court of Chhattisgarh)
Appeal Number : Writ Appeal Nos. 27 to 40 of 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/03/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13954) Chhattisgarh High Court (245)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Penalty cannot be imposed for addition made in respect of Bona fide claims

Case Name : Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/s. Balaji Distilleries Ltd. (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : Tax Case (Appeal) No. 1985 Of 2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 01/10/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13954) Madras High Court (1763)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Mere Rejection of quantum appeal not valid ground for imposition of penalty for concealment

Case Name : Deloitte Consulting India Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No. 152 Of 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/01/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13954) Bombay High Court (1882)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

S. 54F Exemption not available for addition / Modification / Extension made to existing house

Case Name : Pushpa Vs The Income Tax Officer (Kerala High Court)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal No. 30 & 32 Of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/08/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13954) Kerala High Court (909)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

On failure to deduct TDS on web charges amount is disallowable U/s. 40(a)(ia)

Case Name : A.C.I.T. Vs Anand & Anand (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal Nos. 742 & 887 (Delhi) Of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/10/2012
Related Assessment Year : 2008- 09
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Delhi (3706)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Imposition of penalty based on estimation of income not justified

Case Name : The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs P Rojes (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : Tax Case (Appeal) No. 341 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/02/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13954) Madras High Court (1763)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031