Chhattisgarh High Court

Advocate cannot be prosecuted For Criminal Offences For Not Exhibiting Greater Professional Care

Subha Jakkanwar vs State of Chhattisgarh (High Court Chhattisgrh)

Subha Jakkanwar vs State of Chhattisgarh (High Court Chhattisgrh) An Advocate cannot be prosecuted for criminal offences for non-­exhibiting greater professional care and competence while submitting non­-encumbrance certificate to a Bank. FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT 1. The short question that emanates for consideration ...

Read More

HC: No FIR could be registered against offence u/s 56 of Disaster Management Act, 2005

Dr. Santosh Kumar Patel Vs State of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh High Court)

Registration of FIR against assessee for offence under Section 56 of the Act of 2005 was bad, as no FIR for the said non-cognizable offence could be registered and for offence under Section 56, only complaint could be filed by the specified authority / person named in Section 60(a)/(b), that too cognizance can be taken by the jurisdiction...

Read More

Interim custody of Vehicle seized for offence under NDPS Act can be granted

Tikeshwar Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh High Court)

Tikeshwar Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh High Court) Vehicle seized for commission of offence under Section 20(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; interim custody can be granted under Section 451/457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT 1. This peti...

Read More

Section 14 of Limitation Act not applicable to Criminal Proceedings

Radhe Shyam Khemka (dead) through legal representatives Vs Raju Yadav Alias Ram Kumar (Chhhattisgarh High Court)

Radhe Shyam Khemka (dead) through legal representatives Vs Raju Yadav Alias Ram Kumar (Chhhattisgarh High Court) In the matter of Sakhichand Sahu and others v. Ishwar Dayal  Sahu and others2, the Division Bench of the Patna High Court has clearly held that the period spent in prosecuting an application in revision before the Sessions Jud...

Read More

Stringent Bail conditions violates right of personal liberty of accused: HC

Bhagwat Joshi @ Shankar Lal Joshi Vs State of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh High Court)

Bhagwat Joshi @ Shankar Lal Joshi Vs State of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh High Court) Condition for grant of bail should not be stringent, as it would violate accused right of personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT “The delicate light of the law favours release [&helli...

Read More

When equal opportunity in public employment is denied to a class it has to be substantiated by proper data & circumstances

Ayush Medical Association Vs State of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh High Court)

Ayush Medical Association Vs State of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh High Court) 1. Heard finally with the consent of both the parties as urgency was pressed upon the ground that the issue involved in both these petitions are relating to advertisement for appointments of Community Health Workers by training. Since the the facts and issue invo...

Read More

HC Grants Interim Relief to Class A Contractor from Being exposed to Recovery of Tax Demand

Sunil Kumar Agrawal Vs State of Chhattisgarh & Ors. (Chhattisgarh High Court)

Chhattisgarh High Court Grants Interim Relief To Class A Contractor From Being Exposed To Recovery of Tax Demand under the VAT Act and Central Sales Tax Act ....

Read More

Pension can not be withheld for indefinite period contrary to Section 9(4) of C.G. Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1976

Krishna Kumar Tiwari Vs State of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh High Court)

Krishna Kumar Tiwari Vs State of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh High Court) Pension can not be withheld for indefinite period contrary to Section 9(4) of C.G. Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1976. FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT 1. Heard. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner is now aged about 80 years [&hellip...

Read More

Approver who has been granted pardon U/s. 306(1) of CrPC can be released on bail

Rajkumar Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh High Court)

Rajkumar Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh High Court) Approver who has been granted pardon under Section 306(1) of the CrPC can be released on bail in exercise of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the CrPC. FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT 1. Proceedings of this matter were taken for final hearing […...

Read More

Municipality or Panchayat cannot Increase Terminal Tax Rate of transportation of Coal

South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Vs State of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh High Court)

whether Municipal Corporation/Municipal Council or the Nagar Panchayat are empowered to increasing the rate of Terminal Tax imposed upon the transportation of coal?...

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (5,332)
Company Law (7,099)
Custom Duty (8,392)
DGFT (4,506)
Excise Duty (4,467)
Fema / RBI (4,613)
Finance (4,880)
Income Tax (36,523)
SEBI (3,896)
Service Tax (3,695)

Search Posts by Date

April 2021
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930