Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs P Rojes (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : Tax Case (Appeal) No. 341 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/02/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Here, it is the admitted case that the assessee filed revised profit and loss account statement showing the net profit of Rs. 3,92,649/- being 5% on Rs. 78,52,980/- and the same having been done before the assessment was completed, we fail to understand as to how the Revenue is justified in imposing penalty under Section 271 (1) (c) of the Act. Therefore by applying the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in (2010) 322 ITR 158 (SC) as well as the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Tax Case (Appeal) No.273 of 2012 dated 12.09.20012, we reject the appeal filed by the Revenue by answering the substantial question of law against the Revenue.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Tax Case (Appeal) No. 341 of 2010
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031