This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CESTAT Sets Aside Credit Demand as Eligibility of Input Service Credit Was Not Disputed
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Exide Industries Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax (CESTAT Chandigarh)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Chandigarh
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Exide Industries Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax (CESTAT Chandigarh)
The appeal before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh, arose from an Order-in-Original dated 21.04.2016 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Gurgaon. The Commissioner had confirmed a demand of ₹4,24,11,327 under Rule 14 of the CENVAT Credit Rules read with Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, along with interest, and imposed an equal penalty under Rule 15 of the CENVAT Credit Rules and Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 200...
Author Info
