Notification No. 29/2022-Customs (N.T.), Dated: 31.03.2022 – Notification for assigning proper officer for pending cases.

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS)

New Delhi, the 31st March, 2022

Notification No. 29/2022-Customs (N.T.)

S.O. 1545(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 read with section 3, sub-sections (1A), (4) and (5) of section 5 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs being satisfied it is necessary so to do, specifies that, where in pursuance of any proceedings in accordance with chapter XIIA or XIII of the said Act in respect of which notice stands served, after causing of inquiry, investigation or audit, on the person chargeable with the duty in a case where assessment had already been made, or to whom the refund of the duty had been erroneously made, or to whom the drawback had been erroneously allowed, and pending on the date of commencement of the Finance Act, 2022 (6 of 2022), such notices shall be assigned for the purpose of adjudication under the said Act, as follows, namely,-

(A) In a case of multiple jurisdictions, –

(i) pending before either the Additional Director General (Adjudication), Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Delhi or Additional Director General (Adjudication), Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, to the Commissioner of Customs (Adjudication), Delhi or by the Commissioner of Customs (Adjudication), Mumbai, respectively ;

(ii) pending before an officer of customs appointed for the purpose of adjudication of such case, except the officer specified in (i) above, by the said officer of customs ;

(iii) other pending cases, by the officer as assigned by the Board in the notification issued under section 110AA of the said Act.

(B) In a case other than the case at (A) above –

(i) involving duty where assessment already made or duty erroneously refunded –

(a) up to rupees five lakhs, by the Deputy Commissioner of Customs or Assistant Commissioner of Customs who has been assigned the function relating to assessment of duty or refund, as the case may be ;

(b) up to rupees fifty lakhs, by the Additional Commissioner of Customs or Joint Commissioner of Customs to whom the officer specified at (i) (a) above is subordinate, as per sub-section (2) of section 5 of the said Act ;

(c) without limit, by the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs to whom the officer specified at (i) (a) above is subordinate, as per sub-section (2) of section 5 the said Act ;

(ii) involving amount of drawbacks-

(a) up to rupees five lakhs, by the Deputy Commissioner of Customs or Assistant Commissioner of Customs who has been assigned the function of allowing drawback in the jurisdiction ;

(b) above rupees five lakhs, by the Additional Commissioner of Customs or Joint Commissioner of Customs to whom the officer specified at (ii) (a) above is subordinate as per sub-section (2) of section 5 of the said Act.

2. This notification shall come into force from the date of publication in the Official Gazette.

[F. No. 450/72/2021-Cus IV]
ANANTH RATHAKRISHNAN, Dy. Secy. (Customs)

*****

Corrigendum to Notification No. 29/2022-Customs (N.T.) Dated the 04.04.2022

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS)
CORRIGENDUM
New Delhi, the 4th April, 2022

S.O. 1604(E).—In the notifications of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 29/2022-Customs (N.T.) dated the 31st March, 2022, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), vide number S.O.1545(E), dated the 31st March, 2022:-

i. at page number 39, in line 28, `Revenue Intelligence` may be read as `Revenue Intelligence, Mumbai`;

ii. at page number 39, in line 28, `or by` may be read as `and`;

iii. at page number 39, in line 31, `by` may be read as `to`;

iv. at page number 39, in line 32, `by` may be read as `to`;

v. at page number 39, in line 36, `by` may be read as `to`;

vi. at page number 40, in line 1, `by` may be read as `to`;

vii. at page number 40, in line 4, `by` may be read as `to`;

viii. at page number 40, in line 8, `by` may be read as `to`;

ix. at page number 40, in line 11, `by` may be read as `to`.

[F. No. 450/72/2021-Cus IV]
MANISH KUMAR CHOUDHARY, Under Secy

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Join us on Whatsapp

taxguru on whatsapp GROUP LINK

Join us on Whatsapp

taxguru on whatsapp GROUP LINK

Join us on Whatsapp

taxguru on whatsapp GROUP LINK

Join us on Whatsapp

taxguru on whatsapp GROUP LINK

Join us on Whatsapp

taxguru on whatsapp GROUP LINK

Join us on Whatsapp

taxguru on whatsapp GROUP LINK

Join us on Whatsapp

taxguru on whatsapp GROUP LINK

Join us on Whatsapp

taxguru on whatsapp GROUP LINK

Join us on Whatsapp

taxguru on whatsapp GROUP LINK

Join us on Whatsapp

taxguru on whatsapp GROUP LINK

Join us on Telegram

taxguru on telegram GROUP LINK

Review us on Google

More Under Custom Duty

One Comment

  1. K M Sundaram says:

    We received online EODC, whereas the customs insisting for the original and even though we sent to Sahar customs the DGFT Notification No 55/2013-14. It’s more than 6 years over still the Bank Guarantee not released by the customs.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Posts by Date

August 2022
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031