The issue was whether delayed appeal against GST order can still be entertained. The court allowed filing of appeal with delay condonation and directed the authority to consider it sympathetically.
The issue was whether delayed appeal against GST demand could be entertained. The court allowed filing of appeal with delay condonation and directed authorities to consider it sympathetically.
The issue involved recovery of input tax credit without initiating action against the supplier. The Court held that coercive recovery should be stayed, emphasizing that authorities must first proceed against the supplier.
The High Court allowed a taxpayer to seek revocation of GST registration despite a time-barred appeal. It directed authorities to accept a manual application, emphasizing fairness over procedural delay.
The High Court observed that personal penalties on directors cannot be imposed without independent proceedings. It emphasized the need for separate registration and proper procedure.
The issue was whether IGST paid by mistake could be adjusted against CGST and SGST. The Court held that no such adjustment is permitted and directed payment of correct tax with refund claim for IGST.
The court held that the seized quantity was intermediate, making strict bail conditions under Section 37 inapplicable. It granted bail considering custody period and case facts. The ruling clarifies bail eligibility in such cases.
AI Adil Trader Vs Deputy State Tax Officer (Telangana High Court) The Telangana High Court examined the validity of a show cause notice dated 01.11.2024 and a consequential order cancelling GST registration dated 16.01.2025, both challenged under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitioner contended that the show cause notice was defective as it failed […]
The court held that parties cannot introduce additional evidence as a matter of right under Rule 29. The ITAT’s acceptance of Revenue-filed evidence and remand order was set aside as beyond jurisdiction.
The issue was whether lack of detailed charges invalidates a show cause notice. The Court found that the taxpayer’s detailed replies indicated understanding of allegations. The key takeaway is that effective response can negate claims of vagueness.
