Telangana High Court held that grievances relating to multiple GST show cause notices and assessment orders for the same tax period can be rectified under Section 161 of the TGST Act.
Telangana High Court declined to examine the merits of the GST demand and appellate order because an alternative statutory remedy before GSTAT was available. The taxpayer was granted liberty to file an appeal before the GST Appellate Tribunal with statutory pre-deposit.
Telangana High Court directed GST authorities to accept a manual application for revocation of cancelled GST registration where the online portal did not permit filing due to limitation restrictions. The Court emphasized that the application should be decided according to law.
Telangana High Court permitted the taxpayer to file an appeal against rejection of the GST registration revocation application. The Court directed the appellate authority to consider delay condonation sympathetically before deciding the matter on merits.
Telangana High Court permitted the taxpayer to file a delayed appeal against the GST assessment order along with a delay condonation application. The Court directed the appellate authority to consider the delay sympathetically since the taxpayer had been pursuing writ proceedings before the High Court.
Telangana High Court declined to examine the merits of the GST dispute because the taxpayer’s rectification application was still pending before the authority.
The Telangana High Court restored an income tax appeal after finding that notices were not sent to the consultant’s address mentioned in the appeal memo. The Court condoned a delay of 2913 days subject to payment of Rs. 50,000 as costs.
The Telangana High Court granted pre-arrest bail in a ₹97.25 crore GST ITC case after observing that the allegations were primarily documentary in nature. The Court held that custodial interrogation was not shown to be necessary.
The High Court set aside the rejection of GST registration revocation, holding that Rule 23 permits filing within 270 days. It ruled that the authority wrongly rejected the application on delay grounds and directed reconsideration after hearing the taxpayer.
The High Court held that GST revocation cannot be denied solely due to portal time limits where genuine hardship exists. It directed the authority to accept a manual application and decide the matter on merits within a fixed timeframe.
