DCIT Vs M. R. Shah Logistics Pvt. Ltd. (Supreme Court of India) Income Declaration Scheme (IDS), introduced by Chapter IX of the Finance Act, 2016. The objective of its provisions was to enable an assessee to declare her (or his) suppressed undisclosed income or properties acquired through such income. It is based on voluntary disclosure […]
SC held that High Courts of Kerala and Karnataka were not right in holding that the respective State Legislatures had no legislative competence to impose tax on the lotteries conducted by other States in their State (in the State of Karnataka and Kerala respectively).
Registration of a Vehicles according to the provisions of Section 39 of MVA ,1988 is mandatory and a person without valid registration is not allowed to drive vehicle at public place. Use of a vehicle without proper registration number is a violation of terms and conditions of an insurance policy and hence any claim, whether it was of theft or accident or damage to the vehicle will not be payable.
Ratan Lal Patel Vs Dr. Hari Singh Gour Vishwavidyalaya (Supreme Court of India) It can be seen that the impugned order allowing the review application is a cryptic, non-reasoned and non-speaking order as Nothing has been mentioned and/or observed as to what was that error apparent on the face of the record which called for […]
We hold that the appellant could not have been directed to amend the complaint to challenge the repudiation of the contract of insurance. The appellant has stated that it does not wish to do so.
Commissioner of Central Excise Hyderabad-I Vs Aradhana Foods And Juices Pvt. Ltd. (Supreme Court of India) The short question which is posed for consideration of this Court is whether the product `Nimbooz’ can be classified under item `Lemonade’ and/or as `fruit pulp or fruit juice based drinks’. Issue notice returnable on 27.04.2022. Dasti, in addition, […]
Central Industrial Security Force Vs HC (GD) Om Prakash (Supreme Court of India) The respondent, Head Constable Om Prakash1 was prematurely retired on 16.08.2011 in exercise of the powers conferred under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules read with Rule 48(1)(b) of CCS (Pension) Rules, 19722 after completion of 30 years of service. The order […]
The Supreme Court of India has once again reiterated one of the foundational principles of Insurance Law : non-disclosure of material information by an Insured at the time of entering into a contract of insurance would entitle a prudent Insurer to repudiate a claim made under the underlying policy on such ground.
Signatures and handwriting of the person can also be proved under Sections 45, 47 and 73 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Therefore, opinion of the handwriting expert is not the only way or mode of providing the signature and handwriting of a person.
Asean Cableship Pte. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (Supreme Court of India) The short question to be considered in the present Special Leave Petition, is whether, against the order passed by the CESTAT impugned before the High Court the appeal would be maintainable before the High Court under Section 130(1) of the Act or the appeal before this Court would be […]
