Order allowing review application must be cryptic, reasoned & speaking: SC

Ratan Lal Patel Vs Dr. Hari Singh Gour Vishwavidyalaya (Supreme Court of India)

It can be seen that the impugned order allowing the review application is a cryptic, non-reasoned and non-speaking order as Nothing has been mentioned and/or observed as to what was that error apparent on the face of the record which called for interference. It cannot be disputed that the review jurisdiction can be exercised only in a case where it is found that there is an error apparent on the face of the record and not otherwise. Therefore, wh

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.