CIT Vs Classic Binding Industries (Supreme Court) In the instant case, we are concerned with the assessees who had established their undertakings in the State of Himachal Pradesh. Sub-section (3), as noted above, mentions the period of 10 years commencing with the initial Assessment Year. Sub-section (6) puts a cap of 10 years, which is […]
M/s. Gati Kintetsu Express Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner Commercial Tax of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. (Supreme Court of India) Having regard to the facts of the case, more particularly when the petitioner has already paid the tax and insofar as other dues are concerned, which are being demanded, a dispute is raised in this special leave petition in […]
Hon’ble Supreme Court held that CBDT’s Office Memorandum (‘OM’) dated 29th February, 2016 & 31.07.2017 by which AO’s have been directed to grant stay of disputed demand on payment of 20%/ 15% does not fetter the power of the AO & CIT to grant stay on payment of amounts lesser than 15%/ 20%.
M/s popat & Kotecha property & ORS. Vs Ashim Kumar Dey (Supreme Court of India) Issue- Whether after the amendment of the West Bengal premises Tenancy Act by Amendment Act No. 14 of 2001 with effect from 10th July, 2001 [which had incorporated sub-section (8) to Section 5] whether a tenant who defaults in payment of his/her share of municipal […]
We make it clear that the person selected as Member of the ITAT will continue till the age of 62 years and the person holding the post of President, shall continue till the age of 65 years.
Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (Gwalior) M.P. Ltd. Vs CIT (Supreme Court of India) The CIT had no express power of cancellation of the registration certificate once granted by him to the assessee under section 12A till 1-10-2004. It is for the reasons that, first, there was no express provision in the Act vesting the CIT […]
The High Court has read the relevant clauses of the lease deed and has rightly come to the conclusion that payment which is to be made as annual rent is rent within the meaning of Section 194I, we do not find any infirmity in the aforesaid conclusion of the High Court. The High Court has rightly held that TDS shall be deducted on the payment of the lease rent to the Greater Noida as per Section 194I.
Hon’ble SC held that Though NOIDA is not a local authority, it is a corporation established by Act and so payments to it are not liable to TDS U/s.194A of Income Tax Act, 1961.
CIT, Ghaziabad Vs. Hapur Pilkhuwa Development Authority (Supreme Court) The Supreme Court on Monday imposed a fine of Rs. 10 Lakh on the Income Tax Department for its casual approach and for giving a totally misleading statement in the case. This petition for special to leave has been filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Ghaziabad. First […]
United india insurance co. Ltd. Vs Indiro devi & ors. (Supreme Court of India) There is no doubt that if the salary certificate is taken into account the salary of the deceased should be taken as Rs. 1,06,176/- since the gross salary was Rs.8848 per month. That, however, in our view does not mean that the income […]
