Case Law Details
Case Name : CIT, Ghaziabad Vs. Hapur Pilkhuwa Development Authority (Supreme Court)
Appeal Number : Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No(s). 26127/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 27-08-2018
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
Supreme Court of India
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
CIT, Ghaziabad Vs. Hapur Pilkhuwa Development Authority (Supreme Court)
The Supreme Court on Monday imposed a fine of Rs. 10 Lakh on the Income Tax Department for its casual approach and for giving a totally misleading statement in the case.Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
OFFHAND
“…to be paid…” – by whom ? If by the Exchequer (?), why should that be so ? ; which means, it is to be borne out of taxpayers’ monies. Should not the levy and collection be from the ‘public servant (s)’, found guilty , personally, or be recovered from the so-found-guilty, so as to really serve the intended objective of meting out the deterrent punishment for the blatant callousness and dereliction in performance of the individual(s)’duties of office ?
tax