Devas Multimedia Private Ltd. Vs Antrix Corporation Ltd. (Supreme Court of India) Facts- The company, Devas Multimedia Pvt. Ltd., in liquidation has challenged an order of winding up passed by the National Company Law Tribunal under section 271(c) of Companies Act, 2013. The order was confirmed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal. It is contended […]
Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt. Ltd. (Supreme Court of India) Sections 3 and 6 of the MOFA indicate that the promoter has an obligation to provide the occupancy certificate to the flat owners. Apart from this, the promoter must make payments of outgoings such as ground rent, municipal taxes, water […]
Euphoria Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs DGGI (Supreme Court of India) This Writ Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India has been filed for a direction to the respondent(s) to transfer the investigation pertaining to Summons No. F.NO.DZU/INV/A/GST/27/2021 pending at Delhi to the Directorate General of GST Intelligence, Surat Zonal Unit, Gujarat, on the […]
State of Maharashtra Vs Bhagwan (Supreme Court of India) In the present case, WALMI being an autonomous body, registered under the Societies Registration Act, the employees of WALMI are governed by their own Service Rules and conditions, which specifically do not provide for any pensionary benefits; the Governing Council of WALMI has adopted the Maharashtra […]
The order dated 23.03.2020 is restored and in continuation of the subsequent orders dated 08.03.2021, 27.04.2021 and 23.09.2021, it is directed that the period from 15.03.2020 till 28.02.2022 shall stand excluded for the purposes of limitation as may be prescribed under any general or special laws in respect of all judicial or quasijudicial proceedings.
Devarajan Raman Vs Bank of India Limited (Supreme Court of India) The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India has issued a circular on 12 June 2018. The circular, inter alia, requires the insolvency professional to ensure that the fees payable to him during the CIRP are reasonable and the approval of the CoC for the […]
Arjab Jena@ Arjab Kumar Jena Vs. Utsa Jena @ Pattnaik (Supreme Court of India) We disapprove the observations made in the impugned order which refer to the comments made during the course of the mediation or settlement proceedings. The High Court should not have taken the aforesaid comments on record, as the same would impede […]
Export Oriented Unit (EOU) is not entitled to claim refund of Terminal Excise Duty (TED) on its own, however, adds a caveat that EOU may avail of the entitlements of Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) supplier specified in Chapter 8 of Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) on condition that it will not pass on that benefit back to DTA supplier later on.
Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank (RMGB) and Anr. Vs Ramesh Chandra Meena & Anr. (Supreme Court of India) Facts- While working as Branch Manager, it was alleged that he committed irregularities while granting loans to farmers/ villagers under loan scheme. He didn’t take adequate precautions and without writing mandates of borrowers, he transferred the loan amount in […]
We are not inclined to entertain the petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution in the first instance before this Court. The petitioners have an alternate and efficacious remedy of moving the concerned High Courts under Article 226 of the Constitution.
