Explore Pankaj Kumars GST bail case as Punjab & Haryana High Court examines the gravity of the offence, Special Act objectives, and sentence duration for bail considerations.
Explore Praveen Kumar’s case vs. State of Haryana in Punjab and Haryana High Court, analyzing bail granted based on witness count and incarceration duration. Understand the legal provisions and implications
Explore the legal intricacies of Garg Rice Mills & others vs. State of Punjab & others case as Punjab and Haryana High Court suspends final orders for FY 2018-19, citing time-barred notices and challenging GST Act provisions.
In Optum vs. State of Haryana case, Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled manual GST appeals valid and set aside dismissal orders. Learn legal implications and amendments under Rule 108 of HGST Rules.
Punjab and Haryana High Court, through a Writ of Mandamus, instructs tax authorities to allow taxpayers to rectify GSTR-1 details for December 2017, even after the official revision deadline of March 31, 2019.
Punjab and Haryana High Court ruling: Automatic bail cancellation conditions disallowed. Mere violation of the bail conditions would not be sufficient to cancel the bail and that the court must be satisfied that it is necessary to cancel the same, keeping in view the various factors.
Read the full judgment/order of Punjab and Haryana High Court in Gopi Chand Chaudhary Vs State of Haryana. Retired Joint Commissioner granted bail on account of ISS fraud. Details and analysis provided.
Punjab and Haryana High Court granted the bail to the petitioner/dealer involved in the matter of fraudulently obtaining VAT refund based on false and fabricated documents as there is unexplained huge delay and investigation is already complete.
Punjab and Haryana High Court held that petitioner ordered to be released from judicial custody due to pervasive breach caused to the mandatory provisions of Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Arrest declared to be illegal.
Punjab & Haryana HC grants stay on GST demand of Rs. 20.46 Cr on Mitsubishi Electric for seconded employees’ salaries, citing Apex Court’s clarification.
