Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Subscription Books Submit Post
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Custom Duty Delhi HC Grants Section 14 Limitation Benefit After ITC Customs Refund Ruling Goods and Services Tax Advocate Acting as Insolvency Professional Liable to GST Under Forward Charge: Delhi HC Corporate Law Allahabad HC Sets Aside Turnover Enhancement Based on Suspicion Without Adverse Material Goods and Services Tax Allahabad HC Dismisses GST Writ Over Same Date for Reply and Personal Hearing Service Tax CESTAT: Ocean Freight Trading Not Service; Vague Service Tax Demand of Rs. 20.32 Lakh Set Aside Service Tax CESTAT Chennai: Unbilled Revenue Not Taxable Before Receipt Under Rule 6 of Service Tax Rules Service Tax CESTAT Chandigarh Sets Aside Service Tax Demand on Franchise Service and Vague SCN Service Tax CESTAT Chandigarh Sets Aside ₹1.04 Crore Service Tax Demand Based on ST-3 & 26AS/ITR Mismatch
Goods and Services Tax

HC Grants Stay on GST Demand on Seconded Employees: Mitsubishi Electric Case

By Editor5 Goods and Services Tax Judiciary December 20, 2023
Share:

Case Law Details

Case Name
Mitsubishi Electric India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India & others (Punjab and Haryana High Court)
Appeal Number
Only available for paid members
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Courts
All High Courts, Punjab and Haryana HC
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement Mitsubishi Electric India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India & others (Punjab and Haryana High Court) The Punjab and Haryana High Court has granted a stay on the GST demand of Rs. 20.46 Crores imposed on Mitsubishi Electric India Pvt. Ltd. The case revolves around salaries paid to seconded employees and the tax implications arising from the Apex Court’s clarification. Explore the details and the court’s interim decision. Detailed Analysis: 1. Background of the Case: Mitsubishi Electric faces a GST demand of Rs. 20.46 Cr for payments made to seconded employees unde...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement
Filed under

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Related Articles in Goods and Services Tax
Advocate Acting as Insolvency Professional Liable to GST Under Forward Charge: Delhi HC

Advocate Acting as Insolvency Professional Liable to GST Under Forward Charge: Delhi HC

August 24, 2026
Allahabad HC Dismisses GST Writ Over Same Date for Reply and Personal Hearing

Allahabad HC Dismisses GST Writ Over Same Date for Reply and Personal Hearing

August 24, 2026
Uttarakhand HC Allows GST Registration Revocation Application

Uttarakhand HC Allows GST Registration Revocation Application

August 23, 2026
GSTIN or Fee Payment Alone Cannot Establish Service Recipient: AAR Rajasthan

GSTIN or Fee Payment Alone Cannot Establish Service Recipient: AAR Rajasthan

August 22, 2026
CAG Flags GSTN Gaps and Works Contract Tax Deficiencies

CAG Flags GSTN Gaps and Works Contract Tax Deficiencies

August 22, 2026
Rajasthan AAR Allows 5% GST on Handicraft Job Work Subject to Conditions

Rajasthan AAR Allows 5% GST on Handicraft Job Work Subject to Conditions

August 22, 2026
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *