Hence, we request Mr. Satya Pal Jain, Additional Solicitor General to examine the feasibility of vesting the powers under GST regime to the already functional VAT/Sales Tax Tribunals/CESTAT as a temporary measure.
Petitioner-Assessee has to file his annual return for the Assessment Year 2017-18 by 31.8.2019 under the CGST and HGST. However, it is handicapped on account of inadvertent mistakes/errors having occurred while filing statutory fowls GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, which can be corrected in view of legal provisions, however, same are not being accepted by official portal of the department.
The Tribunal noticed that the assessee was holding 1.07% shares of sister concern whereas the partners of the assessee firm Shri Balbir Kumar and Shri Harsh Kumar were holding 6.64% and 6% shareholding respectively.
Writ Petition Filed Before Hon’ble High Court Of Punjab And Haryana: M/S P.P. Automotive Pvt. Ltd., Challenging The Mechanism Of Operation Of Common GST Portal In Relation To The Filing Of Annual Return. Provisions: As per Section 44 and Section 35 of the CGST/HGST Act read with Rule 80 of the CGST/HGST Rules, the taxpayers […]
M/s Rasrasna Food Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Ors. (Punjab High Court) Observing that the twin conditions of presentation of Bill of Entry and arrival of goods stood complied with on 16-2-2019, prior to the issue of notification dated 16-2-2019 at 8:45 pm raising Customs duty on imports from Pakistan, Punjab & Haryana […]
Petitioner-Assessee has to file his annual return for the Assessment Year 2017-18 by 31.8.2019 under the CGST and HGST. However, it is handicapped on account of inadvertent mistakes/errors having occurred while filing statutory forms GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, which can be corrected in view of legal provisions, however, same are not being accepted by official portal of the department.
Vikas Goel Vs Deputy Director, Directorate General of Goods and Service Tax Intelligence (Punjab and Haryana HC) Petitioner has filed this second petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail in a complaint case bearing No.COMA-137 dated 13.11.2018, titled as ‘Shankar Prasad Sarma Versus MICA Industries and […]
In view of Section 90(2) of the Act and clause 4(b) of Article 12 of the Treaty, the provisions of this Act would stand applicable only where fees for included services taxable only if there is a make available technical knowledge. In the case in hand finding of fact that has been returned by the ITAT, there is no make available of the technical knowledge, therefore, the provisions of the Income Tax Act would not stand attracted in the transactions in question.
High Court held that statement recorded during inquiry/investigation may have been recorded under compulsion and the same cannot be said to be voluntary statement.
Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed respondents to release the goods by furnishing security of immovable property where the petitioner has filed the appeal
