ITAT Pune allows final chance for a charitable trust to present case before CIT (Exemption) after registration rejection, emphasizing fair hearing.
In the matter abovementioned ITAT Pune after relying upon the decision of jurisdictional HC held that assessee was eligible for deduction u/sec.80P(2)(a) (i) on the Interest earned by assessee.
ITAT Pune condones 180-day delay in appeal filing for FY 2010-11, citing civil cases, financial struggles, and health issues. Case remanded for merit-based review.
ITAT Pune remands the case of Prakash Dipchand Kapadnis, instructing NFAC to reconsider the addition of gross receipts instead of net income for AY 2013-14.
An amendment to the agreement on September 24, 2014, revised the terms of consideration. Assessee argued that possession of the property was never transferred as evidenced by ownership documents like the 7/12 extract and electricity bills.
ITAT Pune held that addition toward unexplained expenditure is liable to be deleted since assessee inadvertently mentioned ‘commission expense’ instead of actual ‘construction expenses. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
The assessee filed return for AY 2017-18 declaring Nil income after claiming deduction under Chapter VIA at Rs.13,48,854/- while claiming business loss at Rs.3,56,511/-. Case was selected for scrutiny.
Pune ITAT remanded the registration proceedings after accepting the assessee’s explanation that changes in management and resignation of the accountant resulted in non-compliance with notices.
ITAT Pune held that penalty under section 271(1)(c)/ 271AAB of the Income Tax Act imposable even in case of voluntary disclosure or declaration or surrender per se of income. Accordingly, appeal filed by revenue allowed.
Pune ITAT remanded the matter after finding that the trust claimed it had no knowledge of notices issued by the CIT(Exemption). The Tribunal granted another opportunity to furnish documents supporting registration under Section 12AA.
