Case Law Details
Case Name : Sachin Ramesh Pawar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Sachin Ramesh Pawar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Conclusion: Since assessee’s claims regarding possession and consideration were supported by documents that were not presented before AO or CIT(A), Tribunal directed AO to verify the facts by deputing an inspector or obtaining a remand report from the ITO, Satara. If it was confirmed that possession remained with assessee and no consideration was received, LTCG addition would be invalid.
Held: Assessee was running a computer center. Assessee and seven co-owners entered a Development Agreement with Sh
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.