ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance alleging that the hedging transactions in non-cleared securities are illegal are unsustainable in law
ITAT Mumbai held that long term capital loss arising out of the sale of shares and units of mutual funds on which STT was paid and covered under section 10(38) could not be set off against long-term capital gain arising out of the sale of land as per section 70(3) of the Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition u/s 68 for investment in joint venture unsustainable as assessee has duly discharged the onus and given all the necessary documents for the identity, genuineness and creditworthiness of the parties.
ITAT Mumbai held that assessee is entitled to raise the additional legal submissions and also additional claims before the appellate authorities. Accordingly, appellate authorities have jurisdiction to entertain the new claim.
If purpose of incentive or subsidy was to enable assessee to set up a new unit or to expand existing unit then receipt of subsidy was of capital in nature.
Rohan Hattangadi Vs CIT (A) (ITAT Mumbai) From Rule 128, it is evident that the assessee has to file Form 67 on or before the due date of furnishing the return of income as per section 139(1) of the Act, which the statement specifies as mandatory and not directory as per the word ‘shall’ used […]
ITAT Mumbai held that payment made under the Sales or Return agreement are not in nature of ‘works contract’ but ‘purchase of goods’ and hence not liable to deduct tax at source under section 194C of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition merely on the basis of confession during the course of search operation without supporting evidence is unsustainable in law.
Interest income earned by a co-op society on its investment held with cooperative bank would be eligible for section 80P(2)(d) deduction
As the assessee does not have any permanent establishment in India, the incomes arising outside Indian Territories cannot be brought to tax.
