Case Law Details
Case Name : Pushpa Jadhav Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Pushpa Jadhav Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai held that recording of satisfaction for initiating penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is not in accordance with the provisions of the Act, accordingly, penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not sustained.
Facts- The assessee had not filed any return of income for the AY 2011-12 u/s 139 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. On realising the mistake, the assessee in March 2017 deposited the tax due for AY 2011-12 along with interest thereon. Thereafter, the assessee filed a letter da
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.