Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pushpa Jadhav Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pushpa Jadhav Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that recording of satisfaction for initiating penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is not in accordance with the provisions of the Act, accordingly, penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not sustained. Facts- The assessee had not filed any return of income for the AY 2011-12 u/s 139 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. On realising the mistake, the assessee in March 2017 deposited the tax due for AY 2011-12 along with interest thereon. Thereafter, the assessee filed a letter dated 29.03.2017 before AO enclosing copy of the challan towards payment of tax and computation ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031