Tax dispute arose from GSTR discrepancies. Proposal confirmed sans petitioner’s input. Entire liability withdrawn from bank. Opportunity given for appeal.
Read the Madras High Court’s order directing release of imported second-hand digital multifunction printing and copying machines upon payment of enhanced customs duty.
In a verdict, Madras HC sets aside a GST RCM liability order due to inadvertent errors in GSTR 3B filing, remands for reconsideration. Full text of judgment included.
Raj Rekha challenges an order due to accountant’s oversight of GST notices. Madras HC permits contest with 10% pre-deposit. Analysis of the case.
Tvl. Jones Enterprises challenges tax liability for non-response to show cause notices. Madras HC permits contest with 10% pre-deposit. Detailed analysis.
Madras High Court directs to condone 21 days’ delay in GST appeal, citing lack of satisfaction of Section 74. Full judgment analysis included.
In Tvl. B.L. Collection Vs Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Madras High Court allows contesting GST demand due to cancer diagnosis, requiring 10% pre-deposit. Full judgment included.
Madras High Court directs 10% pre-deposit in GST proceedings due to notices uploaded in additional tab, not communicated to petitioner. Full text of judgment/order included.
Despite the possibility of a previous copy being served, the court upheld the petitioner’s right to access the necessary documents by mandating the provision of a certified copy.
HC emphasized that if respondent intended to modify tax proposal, a fresh show cause notice should have been issued instead of deviating from original basis without proper notice.
