Mere Disagreement Doesn’t Justify invocation of Section 263 Revision Power: Madras HC

EIH Associated Hotels Limited Vs CIT (Madras High Court)

Madras High Court held that issue relating to pre-closure premium was already considered and allowed by the assessing authority. Thus, invocation of revisionary power u/s. 263 for mere disagreement with the view of the assessing authority is unjustified in law.

Facts- An order of assessment was passed on 30.11.2007 in respect of AY 05 – 06. The assessing authority notes in the scrutiny order that notices under Section 143(2), including on 09.10.2006, had been issued. The appellant had been represente

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.