Appellant, during AY 2012-2013, paid a huge amount towards provision of toilet facilities in Government Schools where the children of employees of the Appellant were studying. While filing the returns for that year, the Appellant claimed the same amount as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenses and submitted that by incurring the expenses, its productivity improves and the loyalty of its employees are also ensured.
Evolving Systems Networks India Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) The only other ground pressed was with regard to the action of the TPO in treating provision for bad and doubtful debts as part of non operating expense while computing operating margin of comparables. Karnataka High Court has also taken a view in the case […]
Wieland Metals India Private Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT bangalore) Issue before us is with regard to TP adjustment by applying TNMM by the TPO instead of CUP method adopted by the assessee as most appropriate method in respect of determining of ALP of manufacturing segment. As seen from the details of international transactions, the assessee […]
Penalty proceedings under section 271D or 271E were independent proceedings and had nothing to do with assessment proceedings or its outcome. Therefore, CIT(A) was not justified in cancelling the orders imposing penalty on the ground that the assessment proceedings, during the course of which, penalty u/s.271D and 271E were initiated had been held to be invalid.
K. Ramesh Reddy Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) In this case on 30.11.2006, when the assessment was made, the HUF was not in existence. In such a case, the procedure prescribed under Section 171 will have no application as the assessee was not hitherto assessed as HUF and so, the fiction created under that section to […]
Infosys BPM Limited Vs JCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Order of assessment framed in the name of a non nonexistent entity after it ceased to be a subsisting entity, was ab-initio initio void and therefore, null in the eyes of law. On similar facts and circumstances of the case and law applicable, the ITAT, Bangalore bench in […]
Payments made by the Applicant to the Non-resident Company cannot be considered as royalty payments and hence, it does not give rise any income chargeable in India under the Indian IT Act. Held that there is no requirement to deduct TDS under Section 195 of the IT Act.
Karnataka Soaps & Detergents Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) The assessee had set up a branch office in Mumbai. The branch office was housed in a leased premises (leave and licence deed was executed on 5th December, 2013). The leased premises required certain repairs and renovation amounting to Rs.12,95,867. The assessee had claimed the above […]
Atlassian Pty Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) In the instant case, the assessee is a foreign company, which sells software licences to the end-users in India. Therefore, this case falls within the first category grouped by the Hon’ble Apex Court. The Assessing Officer in this case had elaborately examined the end-users licence agreement entered between […]
Jindal Aluminium Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) We have heard rival submissions and perused the material on record. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Bharat Commerce & Industry v. CIT reported in 230 ITR 733 had held that interest for late payment of direct taxes is not a deductible expenditure. In view of […]
