Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jindal Aluminium Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : ITA No.31/Bang/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/08/2021
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Jindal Aluminium Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)

We have heard rival submissions and perused the material on record. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Bharat Commerce & Industry v. CIT reported in 230 ITR 733 had held that interest for late payment of direct taxes is not a deductible expenditure. In view of the clear dictum laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court, the interest expenditure of RS.24,644 paid u/s 201(1A) of the I.T.Act cannot be allowed as a deduction. It is ordered accordingly.

Word TDS written on wooden cubes stock image

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT BANGALORE

These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against consolidated order of the CIT(A) dated 19.11.2018. The relevant assessment years are 2013-2014, 2014-2015 and 2015-2016. Common issues are raised in these appeals, hence, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031