The definition of capital asset as per section 2(14) of the I.T.Act is wide enough to include property of any kind held by an assessee (including an unfinished building) and the sale proceeds of the same would be liable for capital gains as long term capital gains or short term capital gains, depending upon the period of holding.
Infosys Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore held that expenditure reduced from export turnover should also be reduced from total turnover while computing deduction under section 10AA of the Income Tax Act. Facts- During the relevant previous year, the assessee had incurred brand building expenses of Rs.81,79,53,112/-. The brand building expenditure were in the […]
ITAT Bangalore held that deduction under section 80P of the Income Tax Act is duly available to the entities registered under Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997.
Section 80AC contemplates denial of deduction in respect of certain provisions of Chapter VI ‘A’ of the Act, if ITR is not filed. Those provisions do not apply to the claim for deduction u/s. 80P.
ITAT Bangalore held that penalty under section 271F of the Income Tax Act leviable as assessee being a habitual defaulter filed income tax return for four years filed belatedly
ITAT Bangalore held that where the assets and liabilities of an undertaking are sold as a group or lumped together such a sale would qualify as a slump sale Accordingly capital gain on the same should be computed as section 45 to 50 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Bangalore held that interest on deposits kept with scheduled banks only the net interest i.e. the interest income reduced by the administrative expenses and other proportionate expenditure to earn the said income had to be brought to tax u/s 56 of the I.T. Act.
Balaji Auto Enterprises Mysore Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT observe from the order of the AO that the assessee has received cash more than 2.00/- Lakh from the four parties on different dates. As per the opinion of the AO the assessee has violated the provision of section 269ST, therefore, he imposed the […]
ITAT Bangalore held that orders passed u/s 92CA of the Income Tax Act without mentioning of Document Identification Number (DIN) is invalid and deemed to have been never issued. Hence TP adjustments made through the order is also invalid.
ITAT Bangalore held that from clause (5) of Guidance Note issued by ICAI that the cost of construction and also saleable project area needs to be taken into account while recognizing revenue under the Percentage Completion Method.
