Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : K. Ramesh Reddy, HUF Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2002-03
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

K. Ramesh Reddy Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)

In this case on 30.11.2006, when the assessment was made, the HUF was not in existence. In such a case, the procedure prescribed under Section 171  will have no application as the assessee was not hitherto assessed as HUF and so, the fiction created under that section to deem it as HUF will not arise. There is no other provision to assess the HUF after disruption. Apart from Section 171  of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and perhaps to a certain extent, Sub-section (4) ofPlease become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31