Sponsored
    Follow Us:

ITAT Bangalore

s. 80IB(10) not require to begin construction work after obtaining approval from local authorities

June 29, 2011 1274 Views 0 comment Print

DCIT Vs. Akshay Eminence Developers Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Bangalore) – The provisions of s. 80IB(10) of the Act have not subscribed that the assessee was required to begin the construction work after obtaining the approval from the local authorities and that before getting such approval if the assessee begins the construction work, such construction was not recognized. What really matter here is the date of approval of the plan, but, not the date on which it was communicated?

Expenses incurred on cultivation for adequate and steady supply of medicinal plant are allowable even if no agricultural activities done by assessee directly

June 21, 2011 858 Views 0 comment Print

Sami Labs Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) – Assessee had to incur cultivation expenses to ensure adequate and steady supply of coleus plants from the farmers which were an essential input for the continuous processing in research and development activities of the assessee. Thus, these expenses incurred by the assessee for a commercial expediency and were wholly and exclusively for the purpose of its business. In essence, the authorities were not justified in disallowing the cultivation expenses of Rs.90.64 lakhs claimed by the assessee.

Assessee entering into separate agreements for supply of materials, erection and for civil work portion, etc.-No tax deducted on payment made for supply of materials-Applicability of section 194C

June 18, 2011 2874 Views 0 comment Print

When parties enter into two separate contracts, one for material and one for labour, the transaction would not be one and indivisible, but would fall into two separate agreements, one of work or service and the other of sale. In such a case, the provisions of section 194C would apply only to the labour contract and not to the materials contract. The supply portion of the contract being for supply of equipment does not require deduction of tax at source. -Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT (ITAT Bangalore)

Make Available’ under India-Singapore DTAA vis-à-vis Technology Transfer Agreement and Services Agreement

May 17, 2011 8107 Views 0 comment Print

Filtrex Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT – ITAT Bangalore held that payments made under a Technology Transfer Agreement ‘make available’ technical knowledge or experience, and hence, are taxable as Fees for Technical Services in terms of Article 12(4)(b) of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and Singapore. Also, payments made for services in the nature of marketing support and other administrative services do not ‘make available’ technology, and hence, cannot be held as FTS under Article 12 of DTAA between India and Singapore.

Transfer Pricing – Prior Years’ data cannot generally be relied upon to justify Arms Length Price

March 29, 2011 8667 Views 0 comment Print

The OECD guidelines are not of binding nature and even the Proviso to Rule 10B (4) provides that any subsequent year data cannot be considered. The contemporaneous data of relevant financial year is to be used for making the comparable analysis for arriving at the ALP unless it is proved otherwise

India-Singapore DTAA- Technical services provided offshore do not require any deduction of tax at source

February 25, 2011 8812 Views 0 comment Print

It was held that if technical services provided off-shore do not require any deduction of tax at source. In the . instant case, the services have been rendered off-shore though these are utilized in India and as per the; decision of the jurisdictional High Court, no TD5 was required to be made. It is true that through e-commerce, the services can be rendered in India without any geographical boundary but no facts have been put before us to establish that Sun Singapore provided such services in India When the income of the recipients not taxable in India then the appellant was not required to deduct tax at source. Hence, it is held that the appellant was not required to deduct tax at source u/s 195 of the IT Act.

Salary taxable only if it accrues in India – rules Bangalore Tax Tribunal

February 25, 2011 501 Views 0 comment Print

The above decision presupposes that salary would be taxable if the accrual of income is in India. However, in India, salary income has been taxed either if it accrued or was received in India. Being a Tribunal decision, this it would be binding in the jurisdictional location though it is to be seen whether the principles laid therein will be endorsed by the courts to have a wider impact.

Salary taxable only if it accrues in India

February 20, 2011 1628 Views 0 comment Print

Whether salary credited to a bank account in India for services rendered there by a non-resident was taxable in India?

ALP of slump sale to be determined using valuation report, failing which IT WDV can be considered as a reasonable method

February 16, 2011 3449 Views 0 comment Print

The assessee is a foreign company, having a branch office as well as a subsidiary in India. The assessee decided to close down its branch office and transfer all its assets and liabilities as a going concern to its subsidiary. The assessee adopted C

Outstanding receivables from international transactions held to be within the jurisdiction of TPO

January 30, 2011 1665 Views 0 comment Print

By considering the potential loss on the long standing receivables as a genuine adjustment in the course of assessment, the Tribunal has reinforced the principles that the concept of TP cannot be that of an exact science and that constant application

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31