Only a right under the agreement to receive the interest by the assessee without reasonable certainty of realization of the same cannot be brought to income tax.
Undisputedly the assessee has not earned any exempted income. Now it is settled position of law that whenever assessee did not earn any exempt income, no dis allowance could be made u/s. 14A of the Act.
Visakhapatnam bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently held that remuneration paid to partner cannot be disallowed since there is a clause existing in the partnership deed which specified the exceeding limit.
No disallowance U/s 14A of Act need to be made by invoking the provisions of Rule 8D (2) (ii) of Rules as investments admittedly are business expediency investments and strategic investments.
Surcharge and education cess should not be included, while calculating the tax effect. Since the tax thereon was Rs. 9 Lakhs only, which is less than Rs. 10 Lakhs limit prescribed, the Bench was of the opinion that there was no merit in the Miscellaneous Application filed by the Revenue.
Hyderabad bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently held that wealth tax proceedings cannot be proceed against the assessee when the ownership of the land is in dispute.
Whether the omission of reference of section 40A(2)(b) from section 92BA by virtue of the amendment of Finance Act, 2017 w.e.f. 01.04.2017 shall be deemed not to be on the statute since its introduction w.e.f. 01.04.2012?
Pursuant to the amendment made by Finance Act 2017, omission of clause (i) of Section 92BA of the IT Act, 1961 be deemed to be removed from statute since the beginning until and unless there is some saving clause or provision that pending proceedings shall be continued and be disposed off under old rules.
As per Section 199(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 read with Rule 37BA(3)(i) and (ii) of Income Tax Rules, 1962 TDS can be granted only in the year in which the income/receipt on which such tax deducted at source is asses sable to tax.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in its recent order ruled that firm cannot claim refund under the income Tax Act when TDS certificate is issued in the name of the partner of the Firm.
