Dy. DIT (IT) Vs weatherford Oil Tools (ME) Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) On Issue relating to the service tax, learned AR placed reliance on the decision of the Hon’ble Jurisdiction High Court in the case of CIT vs Mitchell Drilling International P. Ltd. 380 ITR 130 in support of his contention that the service-tax being statutory […]
Aforesaid appeal by the assessee is against order dated 28th December 2015, passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals)–37, Mumbai, confirming penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act) for the assessment year 2010–11.
Sharp Designers and Engineers India Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Khinvasara Investments Pvt. Ltd.) Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) AO had not brought any comparables from market to make out that the case that impugned payment was excessive or unreasonable within the meaning of section 40A(2)(b) and based his conclusion merely on low profitability of recipient firm was […]
Dy. CIT Vs. Siroya Developers (ITAT Mumbai) Section 139(1) casts an obligation on every assessee to furnish the return of income by the due date. With a view to enforce the compliance in this regard by the assessees who are entitled for deduction under section 10B from their income, a proviso (fourth proviso) to sub-section […]
Assessee’s case with both original and revised returns filed in time was placed in a better position, therefore, deduction under section 80-IA was allowable, despite the same was claimed through filing of revised return.
Common Area Maintenance Charges and non-occupancy charges paid by the assessee to the Society are deductible from the rent while computing the Annual Letting Value u/s 22
Pest Control India Pvt Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) By no stretch of imagination can Section 14A or Rule 8D be interpreted so as to mean that entire tax exempt income is to be disallowed The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Joint Investment Private Limited in ITA.No. 117/15 dated 25.02.2015 held that […]
IT search and seizure case of Priyanka Chopra: with reference to the materials found specific amount to various heads given wherein the undisclosed income had been utilized, later on retraction by her mother: additions to income held to be justified
CBDT has also clarified that in view of this position, it shall not be mandatory, for the registration granted u/s 12AA of the Act to a charitable institution, to be cancelled merely on the ground that the cut off specified in the proviso to section 2(15) of the Act is exceeded in a particular year without there being any change in the nature of the activities of the institution
In the instant case the assessee has made the payments to the LIC towards group gratuity scheme directly in approved schemes. The assessee has also obtained the policy in favor of the bank. The assessee has no control over the funds contributed to LIC towards the gratuity.
