Ravindra Joma Bhagat Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) ITAT noted that the delay of 2172 days are abnormal and the assessee could not explain reasons which really prevented the assessee in filing appeal in time before the ITAT except stating that due to advice of his Chartered Accountant/Consultant, in our opinion is not reasonable cause which […]
Rajkumar Tiwari Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) As regards the merit of the issue involved in this case relating to the addition of Rs.6,54,300/- made by the Assessing Officer under Section 69C of the Act by treating the cash payments made by the assessee against credit card purchases as unexplained expenditure, the learned Counsel for the […]
Vijay Vasantrao Mahadik Vs Addl. CIT (ITAT Pune) The assessee appears to have opened the foregoing bank account in the name of his erstwhile minor son Mr. Virendra Mahadik long back. He had also furnished his PAN number at the time of his minor son’s bank account opening. Mr. Jasnani vehemently argued that the learned […]
Paradeep Paribahan (P) Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Cuttack) The Assessing Officer in the course of original assessment proceedings has made additions only in respect of TCS on the sale of minerals and the addition on account of non-deduction of TDS in respect of interest on borrowed capital paid by the assessee to NBFC. Admittedly, the […]
Sidiqbhai Usmanbhai Kaliwala Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) It is seen from record, the assessee paid interest free loan of Rs. 21,67,952/- to M/s. S.S. Enterprise, out of the interest free funds available with the assessee, who has made a profit of Rs. 31,04,682/- during the assessment year 2015-16. It is not the case of the […]
Ahmed World Travels Tours & Cargo Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT (OSD) (ITAT Chennai) As regards cash payments made for hotel expenses, although, the Assessing Officer stated that the assessee has incurred expenses in cash, but it was the argument of the assessee that it has purchased foreign currency (Saudi Riyal) to be given to its […]
Held that there is no requirement for maintaining separate books of account for claiming deduction under section 10A/10AA of the Act, and books of account maintained by assessee is sufficient to enable computation of profits of various SEZ units.
Held that the assessee has secured the license right to use the know-how for the period of the agreement and the royalty expenditure in this regard is therefore revenue in nature.
Held that activity of cricket by the club cannot be said to be in the nature of trade or business.
Mere non availability of stock register cannot be sufficient to reject trading results when the audited final accounts and other sources including the VAT data are available to cross verify the trading results including the sales verification.
