ITAT Chennai held that as per Sec.9(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, salary income could be deemed to accrue or arise in India only if it is earned in India in respect of services rendered in India. Hence, salary income as accrued to the assessee for work performed in UK would not be taxable in India.
ITAT Bangalore held that Share Application Money should not be included in the value of investments. Accordingly, for the purpose of computing disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, the Share Application Money should be excluded.
Section 80P(2)(a)(i) Deduction is allowable when interest is derived from credit provided to its members by co-operative credit societies
ITO Vs Shri Ramesh Kumar (HUF) (ITAT Bangalore) It should be kept in mind that the Hindu Law does not recognize a joint Hindu family or coparcenery as a juristic personality capable of holding property and as an entity separate from the members of the family. The true position in law is that all the […]
It was held that once business is set up, expenditure incurred relating to such business have to be treated as revenue expenditure and allowed as deduction. As soon as an activity which is essential to carrying on the business is started the business must be said to have commenced.
Role of PCIT while according registration under section 12A is only to make himself satisfied about genuineness of activities to be carried out by assessee trust and compliance of such requirement of any other law for the time being in force by trust or institution material to achieve its object and then to accord registration.
Reassessment was bad in law beyond four years when the tax payer had disclosed the facts at the time of original assessment proceedings and the AO did not draw any adverse inference regarding the same.
Vidras India Ceramics Pvt. Ltd. Vs D.C.I.T. (ITAT Ahmedabad) The controversy that needs to be addressed so as to whether the assessee is eligible for deduction with respect to the provisions made against the trade debtors in pursuance to the explanation 1 to clause (vii) of section 36(1) of the Act. As per the explanation […]
Dive into Anuradha Pandey’s case vs. ITO (ITAT Varanasi). ITAT’s scrutiny on investment source from closing stock and debtors. Analysis of the disputed addition and its resolution
ITAT Delhi as regards contention of notice not properly serviced held that as per postal authorities explanation the assessee has refused to take notice and such refusal to take a notice is a good service.
