It is to be presumed that the assessee made investments from its own funds but not from borrowed funds. If that is the case the disallowance under interest is not warranted. Therefore, disallowance under Rule 8D(ii) to an extent of Rs. 1,78,490/- is not maintainable.
ITAT Delhi held that confirmation of addition under section 56(2)(viib) of the income Tax Act read with Rule 11UA(2) of the Income Tax Rules without verification of the valuation report of the Chartered Accountant is unsustainable in law.
ITAT Pune held that with regard to first proviso to section 43CA of the Income tax Act effect of the tolerance margin of 10% is to be given retrospective effect i.e. made applicable even for the prior assessment years
Shyama Sharma Charitable Trust Vs CIT, Exemptions (ITAT Chandigarh) The provisions of section 12AA provides that the CIT(E) after receipt of application and calling for such documents and information as he thinks necessary and after making such enquiries as he may deem necessary and after satisfying himself about the objects of the assessee society and […]
ITAT Chennai held that addition for cash deposits out of marriage gift under section 69A partly deleted as in Indian Customs during marriages guests and relatives will give gift depending upon their social status and economic condition
Piyush Overseas Pvt. Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh) ITAT find merit in the contention of the ld AR that where the assessment has been conducted through a virtual electronic platform, it may not be feasible to submit and upload the voluminous books of account, sale / purchase register, cash book, and other ledger account along with […]
DCIT Vs Ashoka Dhankuni Kharagpur Tollway Ltd (ITAT Pune) Revenue’s sole substantive grievance raised in the instant appeal challenges correctness of the CIT(A)’s action reversing assessment findings dated 21.12.2019 disallowing the assessee’s depreciation claim amounting to Rs.3,47,61,85,194,/- pertaining to its ‘right to collect toll’ as an intangible asset under section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. The […]
SKF Engineering & Lubrication India Pvt. Ltd Vs JCIT (ITAT Bangalore) The assessee during the year under consideration has made a provision for liquidated damages for an amount of Rs. 49,20,000/-. The AO during the revision proceedings has disallowed the said amount on the basis that the calculation of liquidated damages is based on percentage […]
ITAT held that As reasons given by assessee is not convincing and therefore the delay of 2886 days in filing the above appeal cannot be condoned.
Provisions of section 234E of the Act are substantive in nature and the mechanism for computing the late fee was provided by the Parliament only w.e.f. 01.06.2015. Therefore, late fees u/s 234E of the Act can be levied only prospectively w.e.f. 01.06.2015.
