ITAT Hyderabad held that FCCDs are debt hence interest paid/ payable on FCCDs in to be computed by applying LIBOR plus 200 basis points.
ITAT Delhi held that notional interest cannot be taxed as income as bank statement of the foreign bank account doesn’t show that any interest has been credited.
ITAT Mumbai held that issuance of manual final assessment order without containing DIN (Document Identification Number) is deemed to have never been issued. Accordingly, the impugned order is unsustainable in law.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that when interest free funds are available with the assessee, it can be said that investments are made out of interest free funds and hence disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act not justifiable.
Explore the pivotal case of Devkripa Textile Mills vs ACIT (ITAT Jodhpur) where the court addressed disallowances on director’s remuneration, depreciation, and expenses, offering insights for tax compliance.
Explore the case of Dr. Shivajirao Jondhale Research Foundation vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai), where the tribunal remanded the issue of registration under section 80G back to the Commissioner of Income Tax Exemption for fresh consideration, citing principles of natural justice.
Alleged interest income is from the Fixed Deposits, which were made by the assessee in the course of business and in order to comply the statutory requirements of the West Bengal Cooperative Societies Act, 2006. Therefore, the same should be treated as part of the business income and is eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act and should not be treated as income from other sources.
Explore the case of Shri T. Sriranga (HUF) vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore), where the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal remanded the issue of cash deposit disallowance back to the Assessing Officer for verification in accordance with CBDT circulars.
Read the detailed analysis of the ITAT Kolkata’s ruling in the case of Community For Social Work vs. ITO, highlighting jurisdictional discrepancies in the assessment process under the Income-tax Act.
Learn how ITAT Delhi’s ruling favored Manoj Mediratta in a capital gain assessment case, setting aside the addition made by the assessing authority and remanding the issue for fresh consideration.
