In a recent case, the ITAT found that the assessee did not receive a fair opportunity to represent its case before the first appellate authority due to circumstances beyond its control. As a result, the ITAT set aside the first appellate authority’s orders and restored the matters for a fresh decision.
In a recent case (Howrah Improvement Trust vs. DCIT) heard by ITAT Kolkata, the addition of government grants as corpus or income was deleted.
In a recent case (DCIT vs. Religare Finvest Ltd) heard by ITAT Delhi, it was ruled that lessor is entitled to claim depreciation on leased assets under a finance lease agreement.
ITAT Mumbai held that FCCB i.e. Foreign Currency Convertible Bond expenses included as part of FCCB premium expenses is allowable.
Explore the outcome of Ramabhai Kanjibhai Patel vs DCIT where the ITAT Surat negates penalty under Income Tax Act Section 271(1)(b) when the assessment gets completed under Section 143(3).
ITAT Kolkata held that AO failed to make required enquiries to go into the question of valuation of shares given by the accountant for the purpose of assessment of income as per provisions of section 56(2)(viib). Accordingly, revisionary power under section 263 rightly invoked.
A deep dive into the Kute Sons Dairys Ltd Vs PCIT case, highlighting implications of an assessment completed without proper inquiry and legal justifications for invoking revision u/s 263.
ITAT Ahmedabad remands Bhavesh Sureshchandra Shah’s case back to the AO for detailed verification of a Rs. 2.09 crores unexplained income claim, highlighting the need for comprehensive examination of bank statements and evidence.
ITAT Mumbai held that amendment to section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act vide the Finance (No.2) Act, 2014 is effective from 01/04/2015 and shall be applicable from the Assessment Year 2015-2016.
ITAT Delhi held that addition in case of bogus purchases is restricted to the extent of 25% of the purchases. As lower authorities made addition of 25% of bogus purchase, the same is sustainable.
