ITAT Mumbai held that TPO was correct in concluding that the rate at which loan is taken by the Appellant cannot be taken as internal CUP to benchmark the loan given by the Appellant to its AE as there is a difference in credit rating of the Appellant and its AE.
ITAT Chennai held that assessee failed furnish any evidences to prove that there are negotiations between assessee and AEs with regard to marketing strategy, sales targets, credit period, etc. Accordingly, TPO/AO has rightly bench marked payment of agency commission as ‘nil’.
ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance of delayed payment of employee’s contribution to PF and ESIC in terms of section 36(1)(va) is incorrect claim apparent from any information in the return. Accordingly, adjustment is permissible under the scope of section 143(1).
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Mumbai classifies investment in ULIP Policy as ‘Capital Asset’, with accretion on surrender taxable under ‘Income from Capital Gains’ and not ‘Income from Other Sources’.
A detailed analysis of the ITAT Amritsar’s decision declaring an assessment order void ab initio due to the wrong section of jurisdiction being cited. An insight into the Indian tax law nuances and key takeaways from the case.
The recent ITAT Chandigarh ruling in Gurdeep Singh Ubhi Vs DCIT asserts that additional business income without unexplained sources should be taxed at normal rates, challenging the application of Section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Explore the ITAT Mumbai decision in the case of Maneken Keshvalla Patel Vs NFAC, where the appeal was reinstated despite discrepancies in PAN cited by the Assessee and Assessing Officer. Uncover the intricate details of the case.
The ITAT ruling in the case of ITO vs Hindustan Breweries clarifies that share capital credited via journal entries does not constitute ‘unexplained share capital’. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act.
Detailed analysis of the recent ITAT ruling in the case of Lear Automotive India Private Limited Vs ACIT, where engineering and development costs were classified as revenue expenditure.
Delve into the notable decision of ITAT Chandigarh in the case of Mahaluxmi Food Industries Vs ITO, concerning the right to set off losses against surrendered business income as per Section 115BBE(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
