ITAT Cochin held that treating section 153D of the Income Tax Act as pari-materia to section 148 mechanism without any such indication in the Act is unjustified and hence matter remanded back to CIT(A).
ITAT Bangalore held that as per provisions of section 44AA of the Income Tax Act, an agriculturist is not required to maintain books of accounts. Further, revenue has failed to establish anything contrary, accordingly, addition made on this count deleted.
ITAT Delhi held that assessments completed u/s. 153A, making addition u/s. 68 of the Income Tax Act, without any incriminating material found during the search action is unsustainable in law. Accordingly, addition deleted.
ITAT Bangalore held that delay of 288 days committed as assessment order mailed to email ID of erstwhile employee and hence delay in filing of an appeal condoned. Matter remanded back to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
Assessee-company was carrying out the business of manufacturing and trading of dies and pigments, but no business activity was carried out during the period when the assessment proceedings were carried out.
ITAT Cuttack allows restoration of Harichandanpur LAMPS appeal due to non-compliance issues, directing CIT(A) to reconsider with an opportunity to the assessee.
Accordingly, the interest on deposits would qualify for deduction under the said section. Appellant Cooperative society is entitled for deduction u/s 80P as claimed in the return.
ITAT Ahmedabad deletes penalty on Shree Gunatit Jyot Mahila Trust for a bona fide error in deduction claim on building construction expenses.
ITAT Ahmedabad dismisses P. Praful & Co.’s appeal for repeated non-appearance over 33 hearings, citing lack of cooperation and relevant documentation.
Tax calculation under Section 115BBE is a rectifiable error under Section 154, not Section 263, as it’s not derived from an Assessment order
