No addition u/s 69A as sale consideration was not received by assessee in relevant year

RATHI 04 Sep 2024 528 Views 0 comment Print Income Tax | Judiciary

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Vaishali Pigments Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Pune)

Appeal Number : ITA No. 1343/PUN/2023

Date of Judgement/Order : 12/08/2024

Related Assessment Year : 2011-12

Courts : All ITAT ITAT Pune

Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Sponsored

DCIT Vs Vaishali Pigments Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Pune)

Conclusion: Additions made by AO on account of unaccounted amount under Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Tags:

Kindly Refer to Privacy Policy & Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

Author Bio

Name: RATHI

Qualification: CA in Job / Business

Company: N/A

Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Member Since: 06 Feb 2019 | Total Posts: 763

View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) as mere claim isn’t furnishing inaccurate income particulars No service tax on preferential location charges if not charged separately HC denied appeal to Deputy Commissioner or Commissioner without depositing disputed Property Tax u/s 406(8) of MMCA Section 80P deduction allowed on interest income of Credit co-op societies from its investment with other bank No tax on amount received as ‘On-Money’ from sale of Flats u/s 68 View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Sponsored

History of Income Tax in India

Key Recommendations of 54th GST Council Meeting Held on 09.09.2024

Procedure of Conversion of Loan into Equity shares

Settled refund claims remain unaffected by SC ruling that overrules a prior judgment

Comprehensive Analysis of 54th GST Council meeting Recommendations

No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) as mere claim isn’t furnishing inaccurate income particulars

Stay granted is extended till disposal of appeal by CIT: Madras HC

Reference to DVO mandatory when assessee objects adoption of stamp duty valuation: ITAT Ahmedabad

Commissioner empowered to designate proper officer for completion of assessment under TNGST: Madras HC

Rejection of refund claim for mismatch in SAD vs VAT/CST unjustified: CESTAT Chennai

View All Posts

Sponsored

History of Income Tax in India

Empanelment with UCO Bank of CA firms for Concurrent Audit

Recommendations during 54th meeting of GST Council

ICAI Reopens Exam Application for CA November 2024

Representation to Reduce fees for filing appeal to GST Appellate Tribunal

Limitation/Compliance periods Under Income Tax Act, 1961

TDS- Section 194IA Payment on transfer of immovable property

MCA Imposes ₹28 Lakh Penalty for Inaccurate Financial Reporting by Company

SEBI clarifies on HRA issues of staff misguided by external elements

Recent GST advisories from GSTN related to Bank Details, RCM, IMS, GSTR-1

View All Featured Posts

Sponsored

Rates of Depreciation as Per Income Tax Act, 1961

Rates of depreciation as per Companies Act, 2013

Due Date Compliance Calendar September 2024

Carry Forward and Set Off of Losses with FAQs

Income Tax audit under section 44AB: FAQs

Section wise Income Tax Deductions for AY 2025-26/ FY 2024-25

Clubbing of Income under Income Tax Act, 1961 with FAQs

Tax Deducted at Source (TDS): FAQs

Tax Benefits Available to Senior Citizens

Corporate Compliance Calendar for September, 2024

Search Post by Date

Case Law Details

DCIT Vs Vaishali Pigments Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Pune)

Tags:

Author Bio

Name: RATHI

Qualification: CA in Job / Business

Company: N/A

Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Member Since: 06 Feb 2019 | Total Posts: 763

My Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Subscribe to Our Daily Newsletter

Latest Posts

Featured Posts

Popular Posts