ITAT Delhi, in the ACIT Vs TV Today Network Ltd case, ruled that no penalty for failure to deduct TDS is applicable if the assessee added back the expense on which the tax was not deducted.
Held that an amount of foreign assignment allowance received for the services rendered outside India by way of (Travel Currency Card) TCC abroad is not taxable in India.
In the case of Agrawal Pathshala Vs ITO, ITAT Delhi nullified CIT(A)’s dismissal due to a lack of substantive review on the grounds. The ITAT noted that dismissal was primarily due to a delay in filing, not a case assessment.
ITAT Pune calls for re-examination in the case of Kunashni Foundation Vs CIT after the rejection of applications under Section 80G and 12A of the Income Tax Act. The appellant argued a lack of opportunity to present evidence.
ITAT Mumbai remanded the matter to jurisdictional AO for de novo adjudication since the assessee was not able to furnish the documents at the time of assessment proceedings and the documents furnished before CIT(A) were not considered/ verified.
ITAT Delhi held that TUFS (Technology Up-gradation Fund Scheme) was introduced by the Government to provide subsidy on loan taken for technological upgradation by the units in the textile industry and hence interest reimbursement received by the assessee is a capital receipt.
A landmark decision by ITAT Chennai reinforces the validity of capital gain deductions under Section 54, even when flat possession is delayed. Explore the key aspects and implications of the Anil Kirthisimhan Wijeyanayake Vs ACIT case.
The ITAT Delhi ruling in Arya Samaj Safdarjung Enclave Vs CIT sheds light on the reapplication process for 12A(1)(ac) registration erroneously submitted, encouraging a fresh approach to tax registration for non-profits.
Baskaran, the Karta of the HUF, submitted that his prolonged illness prevented him from managing the day-to-day activities of the business, causing the delay in filing the appeal. Despite this, the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal, stating that the delay wasn’t sufficiently justified.
Explore the case of Satish vs ACIT where ITAT Delhi quashed an assessment order passed without giving the assessee an opportunity to respond, setting a vital legal precedent.
