Delve into the latest Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi’s judgement on the case of DCIT Vs Vinod Kumar Bajaj, discussing the illegality of income determination based on conjecture and presumption.
Discover the case of Sohanbir Sing Vs Assessing Officer, where the ITAT Delhi ruled that failure to issue notice for reassessment cannot be remedied under Section 292B of the Income Tax Act.
In the case of Durga Signal Infra Pvt. Ltd. vs ACIT, ITAT Kolkata rules that there should be no disallowance made under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act for site expenses incurred for railway business. Learn about the case, its analysis, and conclusion.
Detailed analysis of the ITAT Kolkata ruling in favor of Kippy Engineering Pvt Ltd, where the tribunal deleted an addition made from losses in derivative trading adjusted with business income.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi has ruled in favor of Aman Kumar Jain against the Income Tax Officer, permitting rent paid to a wife as eligible for HRA deduction under section 10(13A) of the Income Tax Act.
Read the full text of the order of ITAT Jaipur in the case of Lalit Kumar Kalwar Vs ITO. The quantum appeal is allowed, and the deduction under Section 54F is granted, resulting in the penalty being vacated.
The ITAT Bangalore in the case of Suresh Sharma vs ITO reaffirms the principle that penalty proceedings under Section 271A of the Income Tax Act cannot be initiated if the Books of Account are properly maintained
Explore the ITAT Chennai ruling in the V.K. Sasikala vs DCIT case, where the importance of tangible new material in reassessment proceedings has been underscored. Learn how the tribunal’s decision impacts the treatment of reassessment cases in Indian Tax Law.
ITAT Delhi held that huge amount as interest free advances given to company which is neither relative/ partner nor connected with Assessee based on MOU which is neither on stamp paper nor stamped or registered creates a reasonable doubt. Matter remanded for further inquiry.
ITAT Delhi held that addition towards unsecured loan under section 68 of the Income Tax Act sustained as assessee failed to discharge the primary onus and burden of proof of providing genuineness, creditworthiness and identity of creditors to the satisfaction of the A.O.
