ITAT Ahmedabad held that interest income earned by depositing surplus grants in a particular mode as per the directions of the State Government is also treated as part of the grants and hence it cannot be treated as income of the assessee.
Learn about the ITAT Chennai verdict in Palaniappa Charitable Vs ITO where income from commercial activities carried out by the trust was not considered exempted from income tax.
ITAT Delhi quashes reassessment proceedings for AY 2009-10 in the case of Agroha Fincap Ltd. The approval u/s 151 of the Income Tax Act was found to be defective and without due application of mind.
In an ITAT Kolkata ruling, deduction u/s 80P for AY 2019-20 was allowed due to timely filing within the due date specified by CBDT. The CPC’s adjustment was deemed beyond its jurisdiction before April 2021
ITAT Bangalore held that interest paid towards refund of excess claim of duty drawback is not in the nature of penalty or fine. Accordingly, provisions of Explanation 1 to section 37(1) of the I.T. Act not violated.
ITAT Mumbai held that where assessee company was amalgamated with another company and thereby lost its existence, assessment order passed subsequently in name of said non-existing entity, would be without jurisdiction and liable to be set aside.
ITAT Mumbai held that twin conditions as set out in section 11(4A) of the Income Tax Act are satisfied and income accrued from Pharmacy store is incidental to the dominant object of running Hospital. Hence, addition towards profits earned from Pharmacy Store not taxable.
ITAT Raipur quashes CIT(E)’s rejection of registration u/s 12AA for Agrasen Jan Kalyan Trust. The appeal highlights that activities should not decide registration, but rather the charitable objects.
In the case of Brightstar Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT, the ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal, declaring the final assessment order void due to failure to comply with mandatory procedure u/s 144C of the Income Tax Act.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Hyderabad ruled in favor of Rajiv Venkataraman, stating that the survival benefit received from LIC on his father’s death is exempt under Section 10(10D) of the Income Tax Act.
