ITAT Mumbai held that Broadcasting Reproduction Right is not covered under the definition of Royalty under the Income Tax Act as well as Article 12 of the India-USA DTAA.
ITAT Mumbai held that “other method” provided in Rule 10AB r.w.s. 92C (1) would be a good substitute for CUP as there is lack of reliable comparables in case of royalty transactions as royalty payments have been made for unique intangibles
In a significant decision, ITAT Mumbai rules in favor of D.C. Polyester Ltd., stating that penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act cannot be imposed for incorrect income head treatment.
Aditya Birla Nuvo Limited receives relief as ITAT Mumbai rules that investments yielding exempt income must be considered for disallowance under Rule 8D(2).
ITAT Delhi quashes revision order, ruling that additional income surrendered during survey proceedings should not be taxed at 60% under Section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai rules that income earned from a consultancy business, even with TDS deductions, should not be taxed under Section 44ADA of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai grants relief to Central Bank of India, disallowing expenditure under Section 14A for securities held as stock-in-trade, citing the Maxopp Investment Ltd case.
In the case of Lakshman Tools Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi), learn about the validity of Section 147 application, non-genuine purchases, and commission payments.
In a recent case, ITAT Pune grants 12AA registration to Kanojiya Pardeshi Dhobi Trust, allowing its charitable activities during COVID-19. Full order analysis.
In a landmark decision, ITAT Mumbai rules in favor of Evermore Polymer Systems Ltd., stating that penalties under Section 271B require a reasonable opportunity to be heard.
