ITAT Chennai held that only the mistake apparent from record which can be rectified but where two views are possible or there is a debate available, it cannot be rectified u/s.154 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Chennai held that revision order u/s. 263 unjustified and liable to be quashed as no findings which proves that there is a violation of the proviso to provision of section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Accordingly, exemption u/s. 11 rightly claimed.
ITAT Mumbai held that once only comparable as chosen by DRP fails, then same loses the comparability for determining the ALP.
ITAT Hyderabad ruling on CIT(A) requirements, reasons for deletion of additions, and appeal filed by Revenue against Bharat Auto Tech Private Limited.
ITAT Delhi upholds deletion of Rs. 1.75 Cr disallowance, clerical error in ITR. Full order details of ITO vs. Roshan Lal Sharma for AY 2011-12 & 2012-13.
ITAT Delhi validates reassessment based on non-filing of ITR and cash transactions in a bank account. Full details of Avinash Chaudhary vs ITO case.
ITAT Mumbai denies capital gain exemption ( Section 54/54F) to Hem Chandra R. Gavankar for investing in a house in his wife and daughter’s name.
Full text of the ITAT Pune order in Yogesh Porwal vs. PCIT. The appeal dismissed due to the appellant’s failure to establish legal standing as the representative of the deceased assessee.
ITAT Delhi validates PCIT’s revision order under Section 263, emphasizing the importance of adequate enquiry by AO for unsecured loans, advances, and income in AY 2015-16.
In the case of D.C. Polyester Ltd. vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai), penalty under section 270A was contested for changing income head. Detailed analysis and outcome explained.
