ITAT Mumbai order in DCIT vs Brandon & Co. (P) Ltd.: Set-off of carry-forward loss of capital gains in demerger. Analysis and conclusions provided.
Explore the JMD Corporation vs ITO case where ITAT Mumbai restricts profit element of purchases at 4%, examining allegations of bogus purchases for A.Y. 2011-12.
ITAT Bangalore held that no computation of fee u/s. 234E of the Act for delayed filing of return of TDS while processing a return of TDS u/s. 234E of the Act could have been made for tax deducted at source for the assessment years prior to 1.6.2015.
ITAT Mumbai held that the finance costs having direct nexus with the business should be allowed as a deduction under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that the rates on which power is available through Indian Energy Exchange cannot be applied, because these are not the rates to the consumers but rates to the DISCOMs. Accordingly, transfer pricing adjustment deleted.
Explore the detailed analysis of the ITO Vs. Direct Trading Co. case at ITAT Delhi, focusing on unexplained share capital, share premium, and investment additions.
Expenditure incurred by assessee for conducting due diligence of a company which was eventually acquired by company is allowable as revenue expenditure
ITO Vs Meyer Apparel Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi): Loan waiver for capital assets not taxable under Sec 28(iv) or 41(1) as cash receipt; not a remission of trading liability.
Explore the ITO vs. Papathiyammal Pitchai Educational Trust case at ITAT Chennai, where a dispute over the denial of Section 11 deduction unfolds for AY 2020-21.
ITAT Chennai upholds disallowance of registration fees and stamp duty for non-submission of evidence in case of Padmanabhan Mohan vs ITO.
