In Mani Sundaram Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai), cash loans from relatives, later treated as gifts, didn’t incur penalty under section 271D of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition in case of bogus purchases should be limited to the extent of G.P. rate on purchases. Accordingly, matter remanded with direction to reduce addition only to the extent of profit margin involved in such purchases.
In the case of Aashish Luthra vs. ITO, ITAT Mumbai deletes cash deposit addition after establishing the source as property sale advance received by the father.
Explore the case of Shantabai Jasraj Lodha challenging additions made by CIT(A) – NFAC regarding a Rs.20 lakhs deposit during demonetization. Analysis reveals discrepancies and remand for further verification.
Explore the ITAT Delhi ruling on the eligibility of management service fees paid to non-resident AEs under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act in the case of Iris Worldwide Integrated Marketing Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT.
Read the full text of the order of ITAT Bangalore in Ambika Ghorpade Vs ACIT case, discussing disallowance u/s 14A of Income Tax Act and expenses under section 37(1).
Ahmedabad ITAT quashes Sec 263 order in Soham Buildcon vs PCIT-3 case, citing absence of twin conditions for exercising power under the provision. Full text analysis provided.
Delhi ITAT ruling on Manish Kumar Mittal Vs ITO case clarifies treatment of cash-in-hand from business profits declared under Sec 44AD, preventing it from being added as unexplained money.
Explore how DCIT vs. Claris Lifesciences Limited case sets precedent for setting off deemed short-term capital gain on sale of depreciable against long-term capital loss.
ITAT Ahmedabad overturns AO’s decision, ruling that penny stock sale cannot be treated as unaccounted income if the purchase is genuine. Details of the case and verdict provided.
