In the Mihir Parikh Vs ACIT case, ITAT Delhi clarifies taxation on maturity proceeds of assigned insurance policies under Sec 10(10D) of Income Tax Act.
Analysis of Kishorkumar Bhalara Vs PCIT (ITAT Rajkot) case, where the ITAT ruled that incorrect assumption of facts alone is not sufficient to revoke jurisdiction under Section 263.
In the case of ITO Vs Raj Maitry & Eskon Developer, ITAT Mumbai decides advance received from customers isn’t income under section 68. Detailed analysis of the ruling.
Detailed analysis of Mahendra N. Patel Vs DCIT case where ITAT Ahmedabad nullifies penalty due to absence of misreporting or underreporting by the assessee.
ITAT Bangalore held that payment made by Google India Pvt. Ltd. to Google Ireland Limited (assessee) for sale of online advertisement space is not taxable in India as the same cannot be regarded as royalty or FTS.
ITAT Guwahati held that the exemption of 10(26) of the Income Tax Act is available to the individual members of the Scheduled Tribe and the said benefit cannot be extended to a partnership firm.
Learn how ITAT Mumbai overturned a decision to disallow excessive commission paid by Srinathji Yamunaji Enterprises, citing lack of evidence and business necessity.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as assessee has established the genuineness of purchase and sale of shares by producing documentary evidence and transaction of purchase and sale of shares is done via banking channel.
ITAT Mumbai held that the ESOP expenses claimed by the assessee is an allowable expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that passing of an order in the name of an entity which has merged with another entity will make the order void ab initio. Accordingly, the impugned assessment order passed in the name of a non-existent entity is void ab initio and hence liable to be quashed.
