K.H. Leather Industries Private Limited v. Commissioner of GST and Central Excise: Analysis of CESTAT Chennai’s decision on duty exemption for goods not received.
CESTAT Delhi held that illegal actions of the importer firms subsequent to the clearance of the cargo from the Customs Station do not attract the violation on the part of the Customs Broker. Accordingly, order upholding revocation of customs broker license set aside.
CESTAT Chennai nullifies customs duty demand on 32mm TMT bars in DLF Southern Homes vs. Commissioner of Customs case, citing lack of expertise in adjudicating authority.
CESTAT Chennai quashes customs duty demand against Blue Mount Textiles, citing issuance of show cause notice beyond the normal time limit.
Discover how CESTAT Chennai ruled in favor of Commscope Solution (India) Pvt. Ltd., granting customs duty exemption based on the minimum operating voltage of patch cords.
CESTAT Chennai grants relief to ESSA Exports by deeming seized goods as ‘scrap.’ Detailed analysis of the order, including the examination of goods and expert opinions.
CESTAT Chennai held that a decision on classification cannot be made merely because the goods are mentioned as ‘Food Supplement’ by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India. Since ingredient of product clearly shows that they have oils of fish, the product is rightly classifiable under CTH 1504 20 20.
Commissioner of Customs vs Gamesa Wind Turbine – CESTAT Chennai rules flanges integral to Wind Operated Electric Generators, qualifying for excise duty exemption.
Explore the implications of the Priyanka Enterprises vs. Commissioner of Customs case as per the detailed CESTAT Chennai order dated 25.01.2024.
CESTAT Chennai held that the advertising materials like glow sign boards, flex printing, broachers, stickers, tags, posters, hand bills, signages, etc., which cater to the requirements of the specific customers, on which VAT is paid, is not leviable to Service Tax.
