In re Liberty Translines (GST AAAR Maharashtra) The Maharashtra Appellate Authority confirmed the Maharashtra Advance Ruling Autority Order by holding that the activities of the Appellant would not be classified as GTA service under the Head 996791 as there cannot be two GTAs in the single transportation of the goods. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF […]
In re Kolhapur Foundry and Engineering Cluster (GST AAR Maharashtra) The question raised by the applicant is ‘The used waste sand which is of the value NIL Refer separate Valuation Certificate by Engineer) will have any impact on Valuation?.’ The jurisdictional officer has submitted that, as regards the second question, value of inward supply does not have […]
In re Vilas Chandanmal Gandhi (GST AAAR Maharashtra) The Maharashtra Appellate Authority confirmed the Maharashtra Advance Ruling Autority Order by holding that the sale of TDR/FSI would be leviable to GST under Heading 9972, at the rate of 18% (9% CGST + 9% SGST), as prescribed under the entry at Sl. No. 16 (iii) of Notification […]
Whether GST is applicable on nominal amount recovered by Applicants from their employees for usage of employee bus transportation facility in non-air conditioned bus.
In re Las Palmas Co-Op. Housing Society (GST AAAR Maharashtra) The Maharashtra Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling while upholding the ruling given by the Maharastra Advance Ruling Authority held that the Appellant will not be eligible to avail the ITC in respect of the lift installation charges paid to the lift contractor, in terms of […]
In re Vijay Baburao Shirke (GST AAAR Maharashtra) The Appellant Authority set aside the advance ruling issued by AAR, and hold that prize money/ stakes will not be subject to GST in the absence of any supply. Accordingly, the Applicant- Respondent is also not entitled to avail any ITC in accordance with the provisions of […]
In re M/s. Apar Industries Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Authority for Advance Ruling is supposed to function within the parameters or the GST Act and Rules and we find that there are no specific provisions under the GST Act, to transfer such application proceeding to the concerned State and there are no provisions for refund […]
Applicant contended that Laying of Paver Blocks on land does not amount to construction of Immovable property u/s. 17(5) (c) of the CGST Act, 2017 and are to be construed as moveable items. With respect to eligibility of ITC applicant has stated that, the prohibition to avail input tax credit is applicable only in respect of expenditure which is capitalized in the books of account and since, expenses on Paver Blocks are not capitalized as a part of immovable property (Land) in their books of accounts, ITC is allowable to them.
In re Vivek V. Ratnaparkhi- M/s. Madhurya Chemicals (GST AAR Maharashtra) A. Whether the classification of ‘Shatamrut Chyavan’ falling under TSH 2309 90 10 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as adopted to GST attracting ‘NIL’ rate (0%) of IGST (0%) CGST + (0%) SGST) as per List of Exempted Goods as per Sr. No. 102 […]
In re Prasa Infocom & Power Solutions Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) From the discussions made above we find that, as per the subject agreement and documents submitted by the applicant, the major part of the contract is supply of goods. These goods are sold to the client by the applicant and they receive separate […]
